Skip to content

At the start of the year, many investors predicted 2023 would be the year of the bond. Instead, while fixed income returns have struggled, United States equities have delivered double-digit returns. Stocks have benefited from conservative investor positioning at the end of 2022, a resilient US economy, and the expectation of an artificial intelligence-led investment boom.

Going forward we believe there is a compelling case for being long US fixed income over equities:

  1. The economic outlook for lower inflation and slower growth favors US bonds. The US Federal Reserve (Fed) is likely done raising rates, and the focus will shift to an easing cycle. Core inflation momentum is converging toward the Fed’s 2% target. The labor market is rebalancing rapidly, due to lower labor demand and strong labor force growth, which should lead to lower wage growth. Global growth is rolling over, led by China and Europe. While US growth has been resilient so far, we expect growth to slow as monetary policy lags kick in.
  2. US agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) look particularly attractive to us, with a higher yield than equities. We believe US fixed income valuations overall are compelling versus equities. Within fixed income, our preference is for agency mortgage-backed securities, which offer similar yields to investment grade bonds but with no credit risk and lower duration risk. The chart below compares the forward-looking US equity earnings yield with the yield on agency MBS. For the first time in 20 years, mortgage bonds have a higher yield than stocks (see Exhibit 1).1

Exhibit 1: US Equity Earnings Yield vs. Agency Mortgage Bond Yield %, Shaded areas denote NBER-designated recessions, as of September 12, 2023.

Sources: Brandywine Global, Bloomberg (© 2023, Bloomberg Finance LP), Macrobond (© 2023). As of September 12, 2023. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

  1. Lower volatility over equities also supports the case for bonds. Return volatility of mortgage bonds is roughly 50–75% lower than US equities,2 making them very attractive from a portfolio construction perspective. In the late 1990s, equity yields were significantly below MBS yields, and that episode ended badly for US equity investors. The chart below shows that the equity-to-MBS return ratio is already more than two standard deviations above its long-term trend (see Exhibit 2).3 The last time we saw that, we were at the peak of the equity market bubble in 2000.

Exhibit 2: US Equity to Agency Mortgage Bond Return Ratio Log, Shaded areas denote NBER-designated recessions, As of September 12, 2023.

Sources: Brandywine Global, Bloomberg (© 2023, Bloomberg Finance LP), Macrobond (© 2023). As of September 12, 2023. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

  1. Bonds may provide advantages across a range of economic outcomes. Overall, we believe US fixed income offers investors attractive asymmetry across a range of economic scenarios. In a soft-landing scenario, we believe bonds are likely to generate decent returns, although they may struggle to outperform cash. In a deeper growth slowdown or financial shock, they could significantly outperform equities.

 

While US growth resilience has been surprising this year, it is important to recall that the full impact of the Fed’s cumulative, aggressive tightening is still to come. We see a variety of factors suggesting slower growth ahead and supporting our outlook for US bonds.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.