Skip to content

Fed pause amidst economic uncertainty?

The Federal Reserve (Fed) hiked interest rates 25 basis points at its May policy meeting, taking the upper end of its target to 5.25%. The Fed also indicated that it may pause rate hikes as it observes how the economy is reacting to its ongoing policy moves. We agree with the Fed that the outlook is uncertain: weak manufacturing, regional bank turmoil and declining corporate profitability are coinciding with a resilient labor market and consumer spending.

Our view is that there is a high probability that US growth will continue to weaken and enter recession later this year. We continue to rely on leading economic indicators, where the growth rate is at a negative level that has historically coincided with US recessions.

Exhibit 1: Leading Economic Indicators at Recessionary Levels

US Economic Indicators: Leading vs. Coincident Indexes
January 1960–March 2023

Sources: The Conference Board, Macrobond. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.

Multi-asset implications of a Fed pause

Despite the economic uncertainty, a natural question arises: Can a Fed pause propel risk assets higher? Looking back on 2022, it’s fair to say that increasingly restrictive monetary policy caused much of the weak asset performance. Shouldn’t risky assets rally if “peak Fed” is in place?

Historically, we have seen a rally across asset classes following a peak in the fed funds rate. Many assets—Treasuries, corporate credit and equities—have done well. Notably, equities, which should outperform less risky assets over time, perform slightly worse than both.

Exhibit 2: Most Assets Have Rallied Around Peak Fed Funds Rate

Asset Performance Around Peak Fed Funds Rate
August 1971–December 2019

Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve, S&P Dow Jones Indices, US Department of Treasury, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute of Supply Management, Macrobond. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Digging further, our hunch is that not all Fed pauses are created equal. Some occur with varying levels of growth and inflation and at different stages of the business cycle. We focus on the business cycle and use the yield curve as a method to further classify Fed pauses. We also look at Fed pauses that were eventually followed by recessions in the next year. What we find confirms our hunch—the later we are in the business cycle, as highlighted by an inverted yield curve, the worse equity performance has been. If a recession eventually follows a Fed pause, equity performance tends to be outright negative. 

Exhibit 3: Peak Fed Funds Rates Occur in Varying Macro Environments

Peak Fed Funds Rates and the Macro Environment

* This is a hypothetical date, as it is currently unknown if the Fed will pause, and it is only listed here for comparison purposes.

Source: FTIS assumptions, Macrobond. Dating peak Fed Funds rates can be subjective, especially during the 1970s and early 1980s when Fed policy was volatile. Our selected periods attempt to best capture peak fed funds rates while limiting overlap between periods. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.

Exhibit 4: Business Cycle Factors Can Overwhelm Fed Policy

S&P 500 Performance Around Peak Fed Funds Rate
August 1971–December 2019

Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve, S&P Dow Jones Indices, US Department of Treasury, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute of Supply Management, Macrobond. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Portfolio implications

We often debate whether growth or policy is a more important factor for risky asset performance. Over the past few years, it has felt like interest rates and Fed policy have been powerful drivers. The analysis above suggests that a Fed pause will not save the day for risky assets like equities, and that it is more prudent to be allocated to safer assets, like Treasuries and cash. We pay careful consideration to where we are in the business cycle and when our forecast of recession risk is high; these considerations further the case against equities. If the United States enters a recession, weak growth is likely to trump any policy easing. We remain positioned defensively in our portfolios, favoring assets like Treasuries and cash over equities. Within equities and credit, we currently prefer higher- quality assets.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.