Skip to content

The upper-middle-market direct lending landscape is undergoing significant changes, characterized by the increasing prevalence of higher Payment-in-Kind (PIK) features and more lenient covenants in loan agreements. This shift is emblematic of a broader trend where these lenders are being compelled to acquiesce to more borrower-friendly terms, effectively blurring the distinctions between the upper middle market and the syndicated loan market.

Borrower-friendly terms: An upper middle market trend

In the upper middle market, the traditional lender advantage is being gradually eroded as borrowers gain increased negotiating leverage. The data presented in the chart below illustrates this trend with striking clarity. As the committed debt range increases, the percentage of issuers with maintenance covenants decreases. For instance, deals under $350 million exhibit a 97% prevalence of maintenance covenants, whereas deals exceeding $1 billion witness a significant decline to 38%. This downward trend suggests that larger deals are more likely to feature more relaxed covenants. The reduction in maintenance covenants gives borrowers more room to maneuver, potentially increasing their ability to kick the can down the road when it comes to making tough decisions to right the ship. This implies that lenders are taking on more risk, as they have fewer triggers to intervene if the borrower's financial health begins to deteriorate.

Exhibit 1: Issuers with Maintenance Covenants

Source: S&P, Morgan Stanley Research.

PIK Features: A Growing Predilection in Larger Deals

The chart below highlights another critical facet of this trend: the escalating inclusion of PIK toggles in credit agreements for larger deals. PIK features enable borrowers to pay interest in kind rather than in cash, thereby providing them with enhanced flexibility in managing their cash flows. PIK features also mean that lenders are deferring cash receipts, which can impact their liquidity and ability to respond to other investment opportunities. The data indicates that over a third of direct lending deals with committed sizes surpassing $750 million incorporate PIK features. Specifically, 44% of deals in the >$1 billion range feature PIK toggles, compared to a mere 3% in deals under $350 million. This pronounced disparity underscores the growing propensity of lenders to accommodate borrower needs in larger transactions.

Exhibit 2: Issuers with PIK Toggle Included in Credit Agreement

Source: S&P, Morgan Stanley Research.

Convergence with the syndicated loan market: implications and insights

The recent evolution of upper-middle-market direct lending reveals a clear convergence with the syndicated loan market. As borrower-friendly features such as looser covenants and PIK toggles become more common, the traditional structural distinctions between these two are becoming increasingly nebulous. Lenders, in their quest for yield in a competitive environment, are being forced to relax their standards and offer more favorable terms to borrowers. This shift is not without risk, as it potentially exposes lenders to greater credit risk and reduced recovery prospects in the event of default.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the upper middle-market direct lending landscape is evolving in response to changing market dynamics. The increasing prevalence of higher PIKs and looser covenants in larger deals reflects a trend towards borrower-friendly terms. The transformation represents more than a cyclical adjustment—it marks a structural shift in how risk and competition are distributed across the private credit spectrum. As upper-middle-market deals adopt more borrower-friendly terms, lenders may find greater differentiation and value in the core and lower middle markets, where covenant strength, tighter documentation, and relationship-driven origination remain prevalent. Ultimately, this evolution challenges lenders and investors not just to adapt, but to think about where genuine opportunity—and resilience—still resides within the broader private credit ecosystem.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.