Skip to content

Three things we are watching

Tariff rollback: 2026 could be the year where US President Trump rolls back his punitive tariffs to a baseline of 10%. Under pressure from elevated food prices, the United States has already announced cuts to tariffs on agricultural imports from Argentina and Brazil. Emerging markets (EMs) could be the primary beneficiaries of a broadening in this pivot in 2026, given they were among the countries hardest hit by tariffs in the Liberation Day announcement.

India/US trade deal by year-end: The United States is expected to announce the completion of its Framework Trade Deal with India by the end of December. This is expected to reduce the current 50% tariffs on India’s exports to the United States to 10%-15%. However, agreement on the more ambitious Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), which is expected to include a lowering of India’s tariff and non-tariff barriers for US agricultural exports, remains a challenge. Aside from reducing barriers to agricultural imports, the goal of the BTA is to increase US/India trade in goods and services from US$210 billion in 2024 to US$300 billion by 2030.1

Russia-Ukraine peace deal. Expectations of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine have increased following the leak of the 28-point peace plan created by US negotiators. If a peace deal is successful, it could exert downward pressure on energy and agricultural commodity prices, given the importance of Russia and Ukraine exports of crude oil, gas, wheat and oil seeds. Lower commodity prices would be positive for inflation in developed markets, creating scope for additional interest-rate cuts in 2026. This could result in further US-dollar weakness, which would be positive for emerging markets.

Outlook

Chinese equities received a recent boost from the country’s anti-involution push, which aims to reduce price competition and industrial overcapacity. Manufacturing and high-technology sectors were focal points of this movement, which became formal and expanded during 2025. The investment team met with some strategic advisors to glean more insight into this reform.

A central objective of the anti-involution push is to generate additive innovation. In a hyper‑competitive environment, price wars and constant defensive spending erode profit margins across an industry, including for market leaders. By contrast, policymakers prefer a smaller number of financially stronger champions in each sector, rather than many weaker players, so that leading companies can reinvest their profits in innovation and research and development, reinforcing China’s broader industrial ecosystem.

Translating this objective into measurable outcomes is challenging because there is no formal metric system, but several indicators offer useful clues. Rising profitability among industry leaders is one sign, while broader margin improvement across entire supply chains is another. Greater international competitiveness would also signal progress: As Chinese firms move up the value chain, more “national champions” may emerge in advanced manufacturing, shifting from volume-driven growth toward higher-value, innovation-led offerings. For example, contract manufacturers could develop proprietary technologies and e-commerce platforms could expand into areas such as cloud computing.

There are also more ambiguous measures of success. Over time, improvements in overall well‑being, consumer confidence and even birth rates could suggest that the pressure of involution is easing and that the nation is sharing economic gains more sustainably.

The risk of a less successful anti-involution policy may have implications for investors worldwide. Continuous profit pressures and misallocation of capital may have negative implications, given China’s central role in many supply chains. However, China’s policies are greatly tied to national priorities. As investors in Chinese equities, our investment process has a top-down overlay to cater to the importance of policy direction in the country. Our China equity funds also favour leaders in their respective industries, as these companies also offer their own competitive advantages. We therefore believe that the anti-involution movement may provide a boost to well-managed companies with sustainable competitive advantages.

EMs are not homogenous, hence there will be different opportunities across the asset class. Our access to industry experts, company management and other sources of information provide us with the ability to balance optimism with risks.

Market review: November 2025

EM equities slid in November 2025. Pessimism over the odds of a US interest-rate reduction in December put a cap on performance. Concerns regarding stretched valuations in artificial intelligence (AI)-related stocks also pressured global indexes. For the month, the MSCI EM Index returned -2.38%, while the MSCI World Index delivered 0.31%.

The emerging Asia region declined, with most countries reporting losses. Technology stocks in South Korea and Taiwan took heed from global sentiment and weakened from concerns over equity valuations. Also in South Korea, the market regulator’s rare caution over the share price rally of a semiconductor company hurt equities. In China, rising geopolitical tensions, this time between China and Japan, had impact on the equity market.

However, Indian equities rose. Market sentiment was largely positive, with cooling local inflation, encouraging progress toward a US-India trade deal and lower oil prices. Corporate earnings were largely positive, which also helped to buoy Indian equities upward.

Equities in the emerging Europe, Middle East and Africa region also retreated, taking cues from global markets. Weaker oil prices dampened investor sentiment for Middle Eastern equities, with disappointing corporate earnings in Saudi Arabia adding to subdued equity performance. South African equities, however, bucked the regional trend and ended higher over stronger national growth prospects and an improving fiscal outlook.

Equities in the emerging Latin America (LatAm) region advanced as a whole. An upswing in Brazilian equities supported regional performance. Lower-than-expected inflation statistics for October 2025 paved hopes that an easing cycle may be on the cards soon. Annual inflation for Mexico also decelerated in October, and the Mexican central bank reduced its benchmark interest rate further. The rate now stands at 7.25%, the lowest level since May 2022.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.