Skip to content
You may delay, but time will not."

The US Federal Reserve’s (Fed) aggressive tightening campaign has likely reached its end as inflation metrics trend decisively lower. Though the US economy and consumers have shown surprising resilience so far, we expect softening ahead. Global growth should slow and we think US economic resilience won’t last, necessitating Fed easing to normalize real rates. While our base case is for a manageable slowdown, if growth decreases more quickly, then rates may need to fall faster to contain a sharper downturn. Overall, our view is that inflation will continue downward amid slowing growth, allowing bonds to rally as markets anticipate inevitable Fed rate cuts.

Key takeaways

  • With inflation headed lower, the high real interest rates brought on largely by fiscal stimulus seem unlikely to persist.
  • A less resilient consumer and easing labor market point to broad economic softening ahead that will likely necessitate Fed rate cuts in time.
  • Between demographic changes, advancing technology and debt constraints, arguments for permanently high real US rates may recede.
     

There is an old adage in the investment business that being early and being wrong is a distinction without a difference. It has been a long and brutal tightening campaign by the Fed in its quest to head off accelerating inflation. Finally, it appears highly probable the tightening cycle has come to an end as inflation continues on its uneven but decisively downward path. Exhibit 1 shows the Consumer Price Index (CPI) less shelter and the Producer Price Index (PPI). The most distinguishing feature is the sharp downward trajectory of both. Absent shelter costs, the CPI has been under the Fed’s 2% target for the last six months. The six-month annualized rate of change of the overall Producer Price Index (PPI) is running at 2.2%. Additionally, the PPI now stands at less than 2% above its June 2022 level.

Exhibit 1: Consumer Price Index (CPI) less shelter and the Producer Price Index (PPI)

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. As of October 31, 2023.

Monetary policy is tight. In addition to the sharp deceleration in price indices, real rates are high across the yield curve. The five-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) rate at 2.25% is more than double the 25-year average of just over 1%. The Treasury curve remains inverted. Money supply has contracted year-over-year and lending standards have tightened sharply over the course of this year.

The US economy, though, has held up remarkably well. The consumer has been surprisingly resilient despite historically low savings rates and declining real income (Exhibit 2). The labor market looks to be finally easing, albeit from very tight levels. This has so far kept the bond market from rallying sharply, which is the historical pattern usually seen after the Fed stops a tightening campaign. But our view is that it won’t take much of a waning in economic or consumer resilience to restart the bond rally. Indeed, the last two weeks suggest the bond market might already be engaged in that process.

Exhibit 2: Employment Cost Index—Real Wages and Salaries for Civilian Workers

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Haver Analytics. As of September 30, 2023.

The Fed has argued forcefully that it will keep rates higher for longer. There is debate not only about economic resilience, but of the “stickiness” of inflation as we approach the Fed’s goal. Additionally, as both the federal deficit and Treasury supply have increased, many have voiced concerns of more permanent high real rates, arguing for containing any upcoming Treasury yield decline. The Fed clearly wishes to defer any rate cuts until it has as high a degree of certainty as it can afford that inflation is down for the count.

The persistence or lack of economic strength will dictate the timing of the Fed’s rate cutting path. But markets are forward looking. Historically, the Fed has waited too long before cutting rates. And if the Fed repeats that pattern, it then would have to cut further than if it started sooner. This is where economic fear may start to build. Our view is that the improvement in inflation trends may give the Fed the flexibility to deliver cuts without undue economic hardship. The risk case, though, remains that the Fed waits too long. In either scenario, we believe an overweight duration position is needed.

We might also push back on many of the recent arguments in favor of the permanence in high real rates. We think the economic resilience of the US economy, aided by fiscal stimulus, helps explain the loftiness of US rates. Yes, there are great fiscal challenges facing countries, but there are also countervailing political needs to restrain deficits. The long-term debt-to-GDP headwind is more firmly in place than ever. Despite currently tight labor markets, demographics will remain a growth headwind. Technology, especially with the accelerating use of artificial intelligence (AI), should remain a powerful disinflationary force. And behind the scenes, longevity will provide an ongoing source of demand for high-quality fixed-income. Ultimately, though, the R-star debate is somewhat of a coffee house issue discussion. The key will ultimately be growth. If growth can reach levels significantly above those of the last 25 years, then the arguments for higher real rates may yet have their day. But if, as most private and public forecasters expect, growth returns to the global 3.5% and US 2% trends to which we have become accustomed, then these arguments may wane. And if anemic growth turns down under the weight of declining inflation and undue Fed tightening, then the old lower-for-longer R-star argument may just get revisited.

Our view continues to be that global and US inflation remain in an ongoing if uneven downtrend. Global growth is slowing. Despite the current US growth resilience, slower growth is coming. Our base case is that the slowdown can be accomplished in a beneficial way for all financial assets as the Fed eases policy to normalize real short rates. If we are wrong, our most likely risk case is that rates will need to fall further faster to contain the slowdown.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.