CONTRIBUTORS
Tony Davidow, CIMA®
Senior Alternatives Investment Strategist
Franklin Templeton Institute
In the latest episode of the Alternative Allocations podcast series, I had the opportunity to discuss lessons learned from family offices with Kate Huntington of Fiduciary Trust International. Kate and I discussed how and why family offices allocate capital to alternatives.
Kate has a unique perspective, having worked with family offices and non-profits, conducting research, due diligence and manager selection for alternative investments. I asked Kate about the role that alternatives play in client portfolios, and how their clients viewed alternatives. “As much as they love that new speculative investment and the highs that it might bring to a portfolio, the sensitivity to losing capital can be even worse than the highs of a great venture capital fund. We're focused on reducing overall volatility.”
I asked her to compare how family offices think about alternatives relative to high-net-worth investors. “The investment thesis is the same. It's about enhanced returns, diversification, and having a long-term mindset.” We then discussed some of the differences like access, liquidity, time horizons, and overall familiarity.
With respect to allocating capital, I cited the UBS Family Office Report, which showed significant allocations to alternatives; I also asked Kate about allocating across family portfolios.
While recognizing that allocations across families can vary greatly, Kate indicated that a 30% allocation is common, with some larger families allocating as much as 50%. As a starting point, she outlined a starting allocation, “So you have 12.5 to maybe 15% in private equity, 12.5% in hedge funds, and then the balance around 5% in private real estate.”
Kate had an interesting perspective regarding the use of evergreen vehicles (interval & tender-offer funds). “We've actually done a lot of work this year on evergreen vehicles and do believe that they solve for some of the challenges of investing in private markets, such as lower minimums. You're not dealing with the J-curve[1], taking four or five years to get fully invested.”
Make sure you don’t miss an episode by subscribing to Alternative Allocations on Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcast.
*The podcast was honored by the 2024 WealthManagement.com Industry Awards in the thought leadership category, which recognized its outstanding contributions moving the industry forward by providing insights to advisors helping to improve their understanding of alternative investments. The 2024 WealthManagement.com Industry Awards, known as the Wealthies, awarded in September 2024, based on Alternative Allocations podcast for the period between September 2022 and May 2024. For the details of the award, including the assessment methodology and judging criteria, please refer to the official award website. Franklin Templeton did not pay an entry fee or other compensation for the award.
1. The “J-curve” is the term commonly used to describe the trajectory of a private equity fund’s cashflows and returns. An important liquidity implication of the J-curve is the need for investors to manage their own liquidity to ensure they can meet capital calls on the front-end of the J-curve.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.
Investments in many alternative investment strategies are complex and speculative, entail significant risk and should not be considered a complete investment program. Depending on the product invested in, an investment in alternative strategies may provide for only limited liquidity and is suitable only for persons who can afford to lose the entire amount of their investment. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss.
Risks of investing in real estate investments include but are not limited to fluctuations in lease occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, which in turn may be adversely affected by local, state, national or international economic conditions. Such conditions may be impacted by the supply and demand for real estate properties, zoning laws, rent control laws, real property taxes, the availability and costs of financing, and environmental laws. Furthermore, investments in real estate are also impacted by market disruptions caused by regional concerns, political upheaval, sovereign debt crises, and uninsured losses (generally from catastrophic events such as earthquakes, floods and wars). Investments in real estate related securities, such as asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment and extension risks.
An investment in private securities (such as private equity or private credit) or vehicles which invest in them, should be viewed as illiquid and may require a long-term commitment with no certainty of return. The value of and return on such investments will vary due to, among other things, changes in market rates of interest, general economic conditions, economic conditions in particular industries, the condition of financial markets and the financial condition of the issuers of the investments. There also can be no assurance that companies will list their securities on a securities exchange, as such, the lack of an established, liquid secondary market for some investments may have an adverse effect on the market value of those investments and on an investor’s ability to dispose of them at a favorable time or price. Past performance does not guarantee future results.