Skip to content

Key takeaways

  • As the Federal Reserve (Fed) has shifted its policy stance, we believe now may be an attractive time to step back into the market and put money that has been parked in cash to work.
  • Investors can tailor their allocation across various fixed income markets based on individual liquidity and risk profiles to attempt to achieve desired outcomes.
  • Short duration1 debt can offer the ability to generate attractive returns while maintaining a lower risk posture, while core and core plus bond funds may present investors with the ability to lock in durable yields further out the yield curve.

Fed easing has resumed, but there is genuine uncertainty about the path forward as the Fed’s “dot plot” forecast shows the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is deeply divided on where policy should go next. While many investors are anticipating deep interest-rate cuts following the easing moves in September and October, we believe these expectations exceed both the Fed’s communicated outlook and what current economic conditions warrant. Absent a sudden, sharp deterioration in the US labor market, we think the Fed will choose to stay on hold at the December FOMC meeting and then possibly cut once more in the first quarter of 2026.

Against this uncertain background, one thing we can say with high confidence is that we believe the Fed is unlikely to hike rates at this stage. Therefore, keeping money parked in cash-like investments such as money market funds and short-term Treasuries may seem less attractive, and we think it may be time for some investors to consider putting that money to work in fixed income markets.

Historical bond fund performance vs. cash

History suggests that even during periods of heightened market volatility and uncertainty, cash has rarely been the best option for multi-asset investors. We expect cash to underperform other asset classes going forward, and as such it may make sense for investors to look to fixed income for risk mitigation, portfolio diversification and income generation. Analyzing returns over the past 40 years, key Morningstar bond categories have consistently delivered excess returns to cash.

Growth of US$100
1985–2025

Sources: ICE BofA, Morningstar. Analysis by Franklin Templeton Fixed Income Research. As of October 31, 2025. The ICE BofA US 3-Month Treasury Bill Index tracks the performance of the US Treasury securities maturing in 90 days. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. Past performance is not an indicator or guarantee future results.

We analyzed historical fixed income excess returns versus cash during the previous seven Fed rate-cutting cycles, using return data from Morningstar. We focused on four key bond categories as they are representative of various risk and duration postures investors typically allocate to within their fixed income exposure.

  1. Ultrashort bond: for investors who are focused on capital preservation and low volatility. This is first step out of the risk/return spectrum from cash and for investors who have cash needs within a year.
  2. Short-term bond: for investors looking for low volatility and liquidity as well as diversification; may be well-suited for those seeking a high-quality portfolio with a time horizon of less than two years.
  3. Core bond: for investors that want high-quality, diversified fixed income exposure that can act as a ballast in a portfolio regardless of the market environment.
  4. Core plus bond: for investors that want similar features of a core bond allocation, with the ability to generate additional alpha through added investment flexibility and diversification.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Yields as of October 31, 2025

Source: Morningstar. Analysis by Franklin Templeton Fixed Income Research. As of October 31, 2025. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.

Morningstar Bond Categories Excess Returns Versus Cash
1990–2020

Source: Morningstar. Analysis by Franklin Templeton Fixed Income Research. As of October 31, 2025. Past performance is not an indicator or guarantee future results.

Looking at these historical bond returns versus cash, there is a clear trend—bonds tend to outperform cash in a Fed rate-cutting cycle when there is not a broader macroeconomic scenario at play, such as a recession or valuation bubble bursting. The only two rate-cutting cycles in which all bond categories underperformed cash were in 1998 (Long-Term Capital Management crisis) and 2007-2008 (global financial crisis).

Looking at performance during the current rate-cutting cycle (September 18, 2024 – November 7, 2025), the ultrashort bond and short duration bond categories have outperformed cash, while the intermediate core and core plus categories have lagged. This can be attributed to the fact that short-term interest rates remain relatively high; however, continued cuts to interest rates could lead core and core plus bond funds to outperform due to the higher-yielding, longer-duration nature of assets in those categories.

With our expectations for a prolonged, shallow rate-cutting cycle, we believe that these bond categories are four solid options that can fit various client liquidity and risk profiles. We believe that short-duration debt offers the ability to generate attractive returns while maintaining a lower risk posture, while core and core plus bond funds present investors with the ability to lock in durable yields further out the curve.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.